例句與造句

1. Kripke refers to names used in this way as rigid designators.
2. Proper names are typically rigid designators, but definite descriptions are typically not.
3. Rigid designators include proper names as well as terms for certain biological species and substances.
4. Rigidity should not be confused with Kripke's notion of Rigid Designators, which are particulars.
5. Rigid designators usually include proper names as well as certain natural terms like biological species and substances.
6. It's difficult to find rigid designators in a sentence. 用rigid designators造句挺難的
7. Kripke interpreted proper names as rigid designators where a rigid designator picks out the same object in every possible world ( Kripke 1980 ).
8. In the expression " Named Entity ", the word " Named " aims to restrict the possible set of entities to only those for which one or many rigid designators stands for the referent.
9. If  a and  b are not rigid designators, no such conclusion follows about the statement  a = b ( though the objects designated by  a and  b will be necessarily identical ).
10. In the expression " named entity ", the word " named " restricts the task to those entities for which one or many rigid designators, as defined by Kripke, stands for the referent.
11. While some instances of these types are good examples of rigid designators ( e . g ., the year 2001 ) there are also many invalid ones ( e . g ., I take my vacations in  June ).
12. He points out that proper names, in contrast to most descriptions, are rigid designators : A proper name refers to the named object in every possible world in which the object exists, while most descriptions designate different objects in different possible worlds.
13. Not pairs of distinct objects, for then the antecedent is false; nor any pair of an object and itself, for then the consequent is true . ) If  a and  b are rigid designators, it follows that  a = b, if true, is a necessary truth.
14. The relationship between CT and essentialism is of interest . ( Essentialism, the necessity of identity, and rigid designators form an important troika of mutual interdependence . ) According to David Lewis, claims about an object's essential properties can be true or false depending on context ( in Chapter 4.5 in 1986 he calls against constancy, because an absolute conception of essences is constant over the logical space of possibilities ).
15. Kripke argues, that if names are rigid designators, then identity must be necessary, because the names  a and  b will be rigid designators of an object x if a is identical to b, and so in every possible world,  a and  b will both refer to this same object x, and no other, and there could be no situation in which a might not have been b, otherwise x would not have been identical with itself.
16. Kripke argues, that if names are rigid designators, then identity must be necessary, because the names  a and  b will be rigid designators of an object x if a is identical to b, and so in every possible world,  a and  b will both refer to this same object x, and no other, and there could be no situation in which a might not have been b, otherwise x would not have been identical with itself.
更多例句：  下一頁